![]() The crux of the Blizzard dispute is that MDY made available a “bot” which World of Warcraft players could use to advance through levels without actually playing the game. It took me a couple of times to read this case – it made my head spin! ![]() Skylink Technologies (a garage door opener DMCA case). Katzer (an open source case involving model train sets) and The Chamberlain Group v. It will be interesting to see the effect of the case on two big cases from the Federal Circuit: Jacobsen v. sale issue, including: (1) what parts of a licensing agreement support infringement claims (as opposed to breach of contract claims) and (2) the scope of a DMCA claim under section 1201. The Blizzard ruling also covers some other ground in addition to the license vs. sale issue and what conditions the licensor can put in place. The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in the Blizzard Glider “bot” case, which is one of three cases in the Ninth Circuit that tackle the license vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |